tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post836579442303822392..comments2024-01-04T01:22:39.435-08:00Comments on The Simply Complex Blog: ROTATION RIGS THAT DO NOT USE THE ANGLUAR DIMENSION PART 2Marcello Sgambellurihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12824595918519858527noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-21536599422058890492016-02-02T12:57:10.310-08:002016-02-02T12:57:10.310-08:00I attended your animating revit families at AU thi...I attended your animating revit families at AU this year.<br /><br />Just applied it to a real world problem. Worked Great! Used the revolve method to animate a static articulating boom personnel lift family. was able to demonstrate to the client an up and over access in a confined space.<br /><br />Whats the problem? there no problem, Give me something hard!<br /><br />Thanks for sharing!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03146346639663353243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-42753710322076973792014-04-08T04:24:04.899-07:002014-04-08T04:24:04.899-07:00Just to say Thanks- very straightforward rotationa...Just to say Thanks- very straightforward rotational methodAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385319631577090371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-38724271417872654892012-04-30T20:27:30.658-07:002012-04-30T20:27:30.658-07:00more than 360 degrees? really?
The piece works ba...more than 360 degrees? really? <br />The piece works based on a circle...if you can find a circle, even a revolution that's possible greater than 360 degrees then it is a number that I think at best is coterminal ...like 425 is coterminal with 65, so still not possible.Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17234312584646868505noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-3236089388798750212012-04-30T19:08:21.380-07:002012-04-30T19:08:21.380-07:00Is there an upper limit to what Revit will accept ...Is there an upper limit to what Revit will accept for degrees? I tried a random angle of 3636376363.000° (yeah its unrealistically high...) and it broke the back angle parameter.NKramerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11949126175641928842noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-73245286938322305462012-04-30T02:04:43.796-07:002012-04-30T02:04:43.796-07:00Hello Marcello
Good post. Rotation is always a pro...Hello Marcello<br />Good post. Rotation is always a problem<br />I posted on a method for rotating annotations at http://revit-waterman.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/rotate-generic-annotation-360-and.html. I've only done this for tags, but the principle may work for 3D elements in the context you've outlined (I think it will, but haven't tried it)Darren Snookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12903139495801907608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-91143156912335611642012-04-29T22:54:05.175-07:002012-04-29T22:54:05.175-07:00Great tips Marcello!! We had a similar "chall...Great tips Marcello!! We had a similar "challenge" at the revitforum last year, and came up with a almost similar way to use profiles to rotate the geometry... Got a "little" off track, and we ended up doing a fully parametric clock :O)<br />http://www.revitforum.org/architecture-family-creation/696-challenge-parametric-corner-piece-7.html#post7362Klaus Munkholmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05525701300218813643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-31960470248728470112012-04-29T00:11:18.663-07:002012-04-29T00:11:18.663-07:00Those were what I call the "Method Pusher Met...Those were what I call the "Method Pusher Method" Postings (and I mean that in a good way ;-)Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17234312584646868505noreply@blogger.com