tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post2216393916470897627..comments2024-01-04T01:22:39.435-08:00Comments on The Simply Complex Blog: Hardcore Revit Site Topography Modeling Class Proposed for 2016Marcello Sgambellurihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12824595918519858527noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-40812962718950122402016-04-19T06:08:22.038-07:002016-04-19T06:08:22.038-07:00Hi Marcello,
I was able to find your "AB3340:...Hi Marcello,<br />I was able to find your "AB3340: Make Hardscape Follow Site Topography and Site Topography Follow Hardscape in Revit" course in AU. Unfortunately, I don't think you had time to cover Tunnels in your lecture. Is there anywhere I can find help to do so? I am trying to do a similar tunnel to what you have illustrated above. I just need a rectangular tunnel going through the Topo. The other tricky part is that my tunnel changes heights. It has a similar idea to the way you designed the wall on the face shaped topo but with a tunnel under the topography. Is there any suggestions? I would appreciate any input. Thanks.<br />-AlexAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-25918316650438981732016-01-29T11:41:29.749-08:002016-01-29T11:41:29.749-08:00Hi Marcello,
This is impressive. I listened to y...Hi Marcello, <br />This is impressive. I listened to your AU lecture online "More Practical Dynamo 2015". I downloaded the sample and everything works great. <br /><br />This got my brain thinking. I have a project with a topo map. To get my views correct I have to create a building pad. When the building foot print changes or foundation depth changes I have to update the building pad. <br /><br />Using Dynamo I can get the bottom of my footings and the boundary geometry. However I don't know if you can build a building pad. Have you explored this? I did a quick google search and didn't find anything. <br /><br />Thank you <br />Danny BentleyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12787298025413537314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-60057500663598898502016-01-11T07:23:48.128-08:002016-01-11T07:23:48.128-08:00Retaining Walls and Tunnels! WOW!Retaining Walls and Tunnels! WOW!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-61878217143039310162015-12-17T07:44:50.469-08:002015-12-17T07:44:50.469-08:00TUNNELS!!!!!! Yes. Sweden will love you. TUNNELS!!!!!! Yes. Sweden will love you. wyankeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17991600235095835094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1180367009829343582.post-39594468461446059522015-12-17T06:15:52.463-08:002015-12-17T06:15:52.463-08:00Hi Marcello.
Glad to hear you are going to attack...Hi Marcello. <br />Glad to hear you are going to attack this challenging subject. What strikes me as most relevant for landscape architects/designers is the issue of 2D plans presenting hatch patterns and colours usually modelled with floor families with the topography tool set entirely divorced from the common paving and surfacing process. Even if floors are modelled at varying levels, the hatch patterns all go AWOL. How 'on earth' can 2D display requirements and topographic features be merged in an acceptable way? It appears as if revit 'out of the box' is offering an extremely poor solution? Would you agree?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com